Desain Perangkat Pembelajaran Pendidikan Tinggi dengan Sistem Lective Gegulang™

Galih Wasis Wicaksono, Hari Windu Asrini, Muhammad Andi Al-Rizki

Abstract


Syllabus and lesson plan (RPS and RPP in Indonesian), which consist of topics and plan for conducting a subject during a period of time, are essential elements for teaching and learning activity. Therefore, in order to conduct subject successfully, syllabus and learning plan should be revised before class started. However, the revising activity is not a simple activity and sometimes becomes a complex activity that takes time. Consequently, in many cases, teachers tend to regret doing this activity; and if do so the maximal result will not be achieved. To solve this problem, Lective Gegulang™ was built to help teacher managing syllabus and lesson plan. Using Lective Gegulang, a teacher is able to work collaboratively by sharing their documents and discussing their work. Lective Gegulang is an interactive tool that adapts dynamically to high education policy and any possible changes, so, it is easy for the teacher to modify their syllabus and lesson plan; and then evaluates its consistency. Then, testing was conducted by four education experts by validating 13 features of Lective Gegulang. The result shows that 48.1% of all features are completely compliance with the syllabus and lesson plan development flow. Then, 46.1% of features are compliance with minor improvement and 5.8% of features need major improvement. Moreover, Lective Gegulang was successfully implemented in Informatics Department, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, with all features was fulfilling all requirements needed.

Keywords


Lective, Perangkat, Pembelajaran, Perguruan, Tinggi.

Full Text:

PDF

References


T. Setiawati, “Pengaruh Kompetensi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Dosen,” Media Pendidikan, Gizi, dan Kuliner, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–5, Apr. 2009.

T. Penyusun, Panduan Penyusunan Kurikulum Pendidikan Tinggi, 2nd ed. Jakarta, Indonesia: Dirjen Belmawa Ristekdikti, 2016.

S. Siagian, B. Panjaitan, and Y. Wau, “Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Interaktif Berbasis E-Learning pada Mata Kuliah Disain Instruksional,” J. Penelit. Bid. Pendidik., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 149–161, Jul. 2016.

Sutrisno & Suyadi, Desain Kurikulum Perguruan Tinggi; Mengacu Kerangka Nasional Indonesia. Bandung, Indonesia: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2016.

R. Susanto and A. D. Andriana, “Perbandingan Model Waterfall dan Prototyping untuk Pengembangan Sistem Informasi,” Maj. Ilm. UNIKOM, vol. 14, no. 1, May 2016.

G. W. Wicaksono and M. A. Al-Rizki, “Peningkatan Kualitas Evaluasi Mutu Akademik Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang melalui Sistem Informasi Mutu (SIMUTU),” KINETIK, vol. 1, no. 1, Oct. 2016.

I. Gunawan and A. R. Palupi, “Taksonomi Bloom – Revisi Ranah Kognitif: Kerangka Landasan untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Penilaian,” Prem. Educ. J. Pendidik. Dasar dan Pembelajaran, vol. 2, no. 2, Nov. 2016.

J. Samra, “Comparing Performance of Plain PHP and Four of Its Popular Frameworks,”, Dept. Computer Science, thesis, Linnaeus University, Sweden, Aug. 2015.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22146/jnteti.v6i4.353

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Nasional Teknik Elektro dan Teknologi Informasi (JNTETI)

JNTETI (Jurnal Nasional Teknik Elektro dan Teknologi Informasi)

Departemen Teknik Elektro dan Teknologi Informasi, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Gadjah Mada
Jl. Grafika No 2. Kampus UGM Yogyakarta 55281
+62 274 552305
jnteti@ugm.ac.id